Long-term visual memory representations, measured by recognition performance, degrade as a function of semantic interference, and their strength is related to eye-movement responses. Even though clinical research has examined interference mechanisms in pathological cognitive aging and explored the diagnostic potential of eye-movements in this context, little is known about their interaction in long-term visual memory.
An eye-tracking study compared a Mild Cognitive Impaired group with healthy adults. Participants watched a stream of 129 naturalistic images from different semantic categories, presented at different frequencies (1, 6, 12, 24) to induce semantic interference (SI), then asked in a 2-Alternative Forced Choice paradigm to verbally recognize the scene they remembered (old/novel).
Recognition accuracy of both groups was negatively impacted by SI, especially in healthy adults. A wider distribution of overt attention across the scene predicted better recognition, especially by the Mild Cognitive base Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).Recognizing others' humanity is fundamental to how people think about and treat each other. People often ascribe greater humanness to groups that they socially value, but do they also systematically ascribe social value to different individuals? Here, we tested whether people (de)humanize individuals based on social traits inferred from their facial appearance, focusing on attractiveness and intelligence. Across five studies, less attractive and less intelligent-looking individuals seemed less human, but this varied by target gender Attractiveness better predicted humanness attributions to women whereas perceived intelligence better predicted humanness attributions to men (Study 1). This difference seems to stem from gender stereotypes (preregistered Studies 2 and 3) and even extends to attributions of children's humanness (preregistered Study 4). Moreover, this gender difference leads to biases in moral treatment that confer more value to the lives of attractive women and intelligent-looking men (preregistered Study 5). These data help to explain how interpersonal judgments of individuals interact with intergroup biases to promote gender-based discrimination, providing greater nuance to the mechanisms and outcomes of dehumanization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized as a motor disorder, but the majority of individuals with PD also suffer from nonmotor symptoms, including mental health difficulties, such as depression, anxiety, and apathy, as well as decreased cognitive function, daily function, sleep quality, and quality of life. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for depression in PD, but motor disability, work schedule, transportation issues, and care partner burden may cause difficulty in attending weekly face-to-face therapy sessions. A promising avenue in the delivery of CBT is telehealth. CBT administered live via videoconference technology may circumvent many of the barriers that prevent those with PD from receiving treatment. This case study evaluates the preliminary efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of 12-week telehealth CBT for depression in PD. CBT administered via telehealth was feasible, acceptable, and efficacious for a study participant with PD and major depressive disorder. In addition to effectively treating depression, the telehealth intervention improved quality of life and aspects of cognitive functioning, as well as symptoms of anxiety, apathy, and subjective cognitive impairment, all of which are prevalent nonmotor symptoms of PD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).Reports an error in "Examining the incremental and interactive effects of boldness with meanness and disinhibition within the triarchic model of psychopathy" by Dylan T. Gatner, Kevin S. Douglas and Stephen D. Hart (Personality Disorders Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2016[Jul], Vol 7[3], 259-268). In the original article, there were several errors in the reporting of data from the Social Emotional Questionnaire. In the "Outcome Measures" section of the Method, under the "Social and emotional functioning" heading, the Sociability subscale was incorrectly identified as the Social Conformity scale. The sentence referencing the data should have read, "However, the Antisocial Behavior (α = .39, MIC = .14) and Sociability (α = -.09, MIC = .02) subscales had poor internal consistency; the Sociability subscale was removed from our analyses." In the last paragraph of the "Research Question 2 Incremental Value of Boldness" section in the Results, the data for the Sociability scale have been replaced with the data fot not be a central construct in the definition of psychopathic personality disorder. Implications for the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) psychopathic specifier are discussed. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/gi254023x.html (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).In two experiments (N = 200), we compared the effects of longhand note-taking, photographing lecture materials with a smartphone camera, and not taking any notes on video-recorded lecture learning. Experiment 1 revealed a longhand-superiority effect Longhand note-takers outperformed photo-takers and control learners on a recall test, notwithstanding an equal opportunity to review their learning material right before being tested, and even when photo-takers and control participants reviewed an exact transcript of the lecture slides via their photos or printouts, whereas longhand note-takers accessed only a fraction of the content as captured in their handwritten notes. Photo-takers performed comparably to learners who had not taken any notes at all. Experiment 2 further showed that mind-wandering mediates the mnemonic benefits of longhand note-taking Relative to learners who took photos or did not take any notes, longhand note-takers mind-wandered less and, in turn, demonstrated superior retention of the lecture content. Yet, across both experiments, learners were not cognizant of the advantages of longhand note-taking, but misjudged all three techniques to be equally effective. These findings point to key attentional differences between longhand note-taking and photo-taking that impact learning-knowledge that is easily and conveniently acquired in a snap may not be better remembered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).